This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [ob/6.0] Fix a new sparc build failure


On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 05:27:52PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:

>sparc_y_regnum is mentioned in the tm header, so sparc-nat.c actually
>references it.  Fixes another sparc-native build failure; checked in.


Missing an extern declaration? The nat file would be getting -Wimplict.


No, the extern declaration is there too.  There was an extern followed
by a static, which some future version of GCC (probably 3.4) will warn
about.

Huh?


cagney@nettle$ gcc --version
2.95.3
cagney@nettle$ gcc -c foo.c
foo.c:2: warning: static declaration for `foo' follows non-static
cagney@nettle$ cat foo.c
extern void foo (void);
static void foo (void) { };

Notice where it occures:

#if defined (GDB_MULTI_ARCH) && (GDB_MULTI_ARCH > 0)
[...]
/* Multi-arch the nPC and Y registers.  */
#define Y_REGNUM              (sparc_y_regnum ())
extern int sparc_npc_regnum (void);
extern int sparc_y_regnum (void);

And the sparc-elf cross target, it turns out, isn't multi-arch so wouldn' get the warning :-/

Can you please move the extern declaration to "sparc-tdep.h"? Without it, there's yet another -Wmissing-prototypes to fix.

Andrew



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]