This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch rfc, 6.0?] only allow raw raw registers; Was: [patch rfc]Add NUM_REGS pseudo regs to MIPS

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Cc: Steve Watt <steve at asicdesigners dot com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:37:12 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch rfc, 6.0?] only allow raw raw registers; Was: [patch rfc]Add NUM_REGS pseudo regs to MIPS
References: <200307271855.h6RItIho043770@oberon.asicdesigners.com> <3F2442B3.1000506@redhat.com>

I've checked this tweak into 6.0 and mainline:

2003-07-27 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
	* mips-tdep.c (print_gp_register_row): Print the GPR's register
	MOD NUM_REGS.

and this change into just the mainline (6.0 will follow in a few days if no one notices a problem):

2003-07-27 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>

	* regcache.c (struct regcache_descr): Update comments on
	nr_raw_registers.
	(init_legacy_regcache_descr): Don't set nr_raw_registers or
	sizeof_raw_register_valid_p.
	(init_regcache_descr): Set nr_raw_registers and
	sizeof_raw_register_valid_p before calling
	init_legacy_regcache_descr.

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch rfc, 6.0?] only allow raw raw registers; Was: [patch rfc] Add NUM_REGS pseudo regs to MIPS
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [patch rfc, 6.0?] only allow raw raw registers; Was: [patch rfc]Add NUM_REGS pseudo regs to MIPS
  - From: Andrew Cagney

References:
- Re: [patch rfc, 6.0?] only allow raw raw registers; Was: [patch rfc] Add NUM_REGS pseudo regs to MIPS
  - From: Steve Watt
- Re: [patch rfc, 6.0?] only allow raw raw registers; Was: [patch rfc]Add NUM_REGS pseudo regs to MIPS
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]