This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFA: Actual support for tracing forks on GNU/Linux
- From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at chello dot nl>
- To: drow at mvista dot com
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, msnyder at redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 18:11:41 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: RFA: Actual support for tracing forks on GNU/Linux
- References: <20030618232942.GA982@nevyn.them.org> <20030628163444.GB9716@nevyn.them.org> <20030709215713.GA25331@nevyn.them.org> <20030724184849.GC1842@nevyn.them.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 14:48:49 -0400
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Ping.
Sorry Daniel for not responding earlier. I've had almost no time to
spend on hacking since the second half of june and I've just returned
from a vacation in Finland. Anyway, I do have a few comments:
* I'm not very enthousiastic about the staggering of
CHILD_POST_STARTUP_INFERIOR and LINUX_CHILD_POST_STARTUP_INFERIOR,
especially since it infects i386-nat.c. However, I'm pretty sure
there isn't a better alternative that doesn't involve redisigning
the target vector :-(. I'd appreciate though if you could stick in
a comment somewhere that says this is really ugly.
* The changes to lin-lwp.c seem pretty much OK to me.
So I think this can go in.
Mark