This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8]
- From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
- To: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
- Cc: drow at mvista dot com, msnyder at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 18:34:20 +0200
- Subject: Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8]
- References: <20031008165534.GA8718@nevyn.them.org> <3F92B3E5.8010209@gnu.org>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
> Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:55:17 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
>
> I get the feeling that the naming discussion has converged to:
>
> "breakpoint" and "location"
Did it? I (perhaps among others) suggested that, but I'm not sure
people agreed to it.
> Unlike the "user" vs "machine" I don't see us having much difficulty
> explaining "breakpoint" and "location" to either users or developers. Ya!
Obviously, I agree ;-)