Re: [patch] New testcase for PR:1291

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>]

On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 01:37:52PM -0400, Kris Warkentin wrote:
> > > main()
> > > {
> > >         sub1();
> > >         sub2();
> > > }
> > 
> > A test which looks like this should not, I think, go in gdb.arch or be
> > skipped for non-SH.  What you may want to do is leave it where it is
> > and write the testcase in assembly - that's what the gdb.arch directory
> > is for.  See i386-prolouge.c.
> 
> I think I need an executive decision here.
> 
> A) move it and make it generic.
> B) leave it and write it in assembly.
> 
> Pick one.

Either's fine with me; Elena liked the test you posted so go ahead. 
Just stick it in gdb.base?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer