This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: ia64 portion of libunwind patch

From: David Mosberger <davidm at napali dot hpl dot hp dot com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
Cc: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com, "J. Johnston" <jjohnstn at redhat dot com>,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, Kevin Buettner <kevinb at redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:55:03 -0800
Subject: Re: RFA: ia64 portion of libunwind patch
References: <3FA2B71A.3080905@redhat.com><3FA2CA1B.7000502@redhat.com><16290.59502.799536.383397@napali.hpl.hp.com><3FAC12D3.2070207@redhat.com><16300.8192.489647.740612@napali.hpl.hp.com><3FAC2454.2030009@redhat.com><16300.9949.513264.716812@napali.hpl.hp.com><3FAC2D03.8070607@redhat.com>
Reply-to: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com

>>>>> On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 18:38:43 -0500, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> said:

  Andrew> Draging that entire buffer (128k in the case of a program
  Andrew> like GDB) across the remote link is going to raise a few
  Andrew> eyebrows so a careful examination is justified.

Oh.  Can you remind me why gdb wouldn't be grabbing the unwind table
from the ELF binary instead?  You don't drag the debug info over the
remote link either, right?

	--david

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFA: ia64 portion of libunwind patch
  - From: Andrew Cagney

References:
- Re: RFA: ia64 portion of libunwind patch
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: RFA: ia64 portion of libunwind patch
  - From: David Mosberger
- Re: RFA: ia64 portion of libunwind patch
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: RFA: ia64 portion of libunwind patch
  - From: David Mosberger
- Re: RFA: ia64 portion of libunwind patch
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]