This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Right -- I meant *these* changelog entries:
[msnyder@reddwarf gdb]$ grep sysv_abi_return_value ChangeLog * ppc-tdep.h (ppc_sysv_abi_return_value): Ditto. (ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value): Ditto. (ppc_sysv_abi_return_value): Ditto. (ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value): Ditto. * ppc-sysv-tdep.c (ppc_sysv_abi_return_value): New function. * ppc-tdep.h (ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value): Declare. (ppc_sysv_abi_return_value): Declare. (ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value): New function.
Sorry, I'm lost. What's wrong with those ChangeLogs?
s/abi_return_value/abi_store_return_value/g
What?
;-) Honest, I didn't mean to make a federal case out of this -- your original suggestion to me was to look for a function called "ppc_sysv_abi_return_value". That function doesn't exist -- but there are several references to it in the changelog. I eventually figured out that it was missing the word "store_", as in "store_return_value". So I asked if you'd like me to fix up the change log entries, so they would match the actual function name.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |