This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] Use i*86-*-* as a pattern for KFAILs in structs.exp


This way we also KFAIL on i386, i486, i586 and i786, which have the
same issues.  Tested on i386-unwknown-freebsd4.7.

Committed (as obvious).

Mark


Index: testsuite/ChangeLog
from  Mark Kettenis  <kettenis@gnu.org>

	* gdb.base/structs.exp: Use i*86-*-* instead of i686-*-* as a
	pattern for the KFAILs.

Index: testsuite/gdb.base/structs.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/structs.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.11 structs.exp
--- testsuite/gdb.base/structs.exp 23 Nov 2003 17:48:00 -0000 1.11
+++ testsuite/gdb.base/structs.exp 27 Nov 2003 20:38:15 -0000
@@ -217,8 +217,8 @@ proc test_struct_calls { n } {
     set tests "call $n ${testfile}"
 
     # Call fun${n}, checking the printed return-value.
-    setup_kfails structs-*tld* i686-*-* gdb/1447
-    setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-* gcc-3-3 "DWARF 2" i686-*-* gdb/1455
+    setup_kfails structs-*tld* i*86-*-* gdb/1447
+    setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-* gcc-3-3 "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
     gdb_test "p/c fun${n}()"  "[foo ${n}]" "p/c fun<n>(); ${tests}"
 
     # Check that GDB can always pass a structure to an inferior function.
@@ -229,8 +229,8 @@ proc test_struct_calls { n } {
     # examining that global to confirm that the value is as expected.
 
     gdb_test "call Fun${n}(foo${n})" "" "call Fun<n>(foo<n>); ${tests}"
-    setup_kfails structs-*tld* i686-*-* gdb/1447
-    setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-* gcc-3-3 "DWARF 2" i686-*-* gdb/1455
+    setup_kfails structs-*tld* i*86-*-* gdb/1447
+    setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-* gcc-3-3 "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
     gdb_test "p/c L${n}" [foo ${n}] "p/c L<n>; ${tests}"
 }
 
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ proc test_struct_returns { n } {
 	    "advance to fun<n> for return; ${tests}"
 
     # Check that the program invalidated the relevant global.
-    setup_kfails structs-tld i686-*-* gdb/1447
+    setup_kfails structs-tld i*86-*-* gdb/1447
     gdb_test "p/c L${n}" " = [zed $n]" "zed L<n> for return; ${tests} .${testfile}."
 
     # Force the "return".  This checks that the return is always
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ proc test_struct_returns { n } {
     # "return_value_unknown" set above.
 
     set test "value foo<n> returned; ${tests}"
-    setup_kfails structs-*tld* i686-*-* gdb/1447
+    setup_kfails structs-*tld* i*86-*-* gdb/1447
     gdb_test_multiple "p/c L${n}" "${test}" {
 	-re " = [foo ${n}].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
 	    if $return_value_unknown {
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ proc test_struct_returns { n } {
 	    "advance to fun<n> for finish; ${tests}"
 
     # Check that the program invalidated the relevant global.
-    setup_kfails structs-tld i686-*-* gdb/1447
+    setup_kfails structs-tld i*86-*-* gdb/1447
     gdb_test "p/c L${n}" " = [zed $n]" "zed L<n> for finish; ${tests}"
 
     # Finish the function, set 'finish_value_unknown" to non-empty if the
@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ proc test_struct_returns { n } {
     # "p/c".  If no return value was found, the 'Z' from the previous
     # check that the variable was cleared, is printed.
     set test "value foo<n> finished; ${tests}"
-    setup_kfails structs-*tld* i686-*-* gdb/1447
+    setup_kfails structs-*tld* i*86-*-* gdb/1447
     gdb_test_multiple "p/c" "${test}" {
 	-re "[foo ${n}]\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" {
 	    if $finish_value_unknown {


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]