This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] S/390 port modernization 1/4


Jim Blandy wrote:

> The regset_from_core_section stuff is done exactly the way the i386
> and x86-64 do it, so I won't criticize it.  But there are two things I
> wonder about:
> 
> - Since core file formats are really OS-specific (ABI's often don't
>   specify them), wouldn't it make more sense for the *-nat.c file to
>   register an OS/ABI handler, and have that handler register the
>   regset_from_core_section method?

Defining the core file format in *-nat.c would mean that a cross-gdb
wouldn't understand core files, right?
 
> - Why does everyone allocate the 'struct regset' objects dynamically?
>   The regset layouts are structures in header files, so there's only a
>   static set of them; one could simply define initialized instances of
>   'struct regset', and the regset_from_core_section method could
>   return them.  That seems simpler than allocating them dynamically,
>   and caching them in the tdep structure.

OK, I'll change that.

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  weigand@informatik.uni-erlangen.de


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]