This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA/dwarf-2] Fix for the null record problem
- From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>
- To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at gnat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:44:27 -0500
- Subject: Re: [RFA/dwarf-2] Fix for the null record problem
- References: <20040219140145.GB804@gnat.com>
Joel Brobecker writes:
> Hello,
>
> This is a followup on the thread that started with:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-02/msg00058.html
>
> The test proposed under that thread was dropped because an empty
> struct is not legal C. However, it is legal in Ada, and I've seen
> a message saying that it is also legal in C++.
>
Let's try the Vulcan mind meld: "We need a gdb.ada directory. We need
a gdb.ada directory. We need a gdb.ada directory. We need a gdb.ada
directory." :-)
Seriously, I'd like to see a testcase that FAIL->PASS with this patch.
Can somebody get a C++ testcase, at least?
the patch looks sensible, but I would like to see the testcase go in
at the same time, or we'll forget.
elena
> I have found the source of the problem, and suggest the attached patch.
> The problem was that GDB was mistakenly deducing that the empry record
> was only a stub because of the lack of fields, and was therefore tagging
> it with TYPE_FLAG_STUB. This is not correct. Instead, the right
> approach, I believe, is to check for the DW_AT_declaration attribute.
>
> 2004-02-19 J. Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
>
> * dwarf2read.c (read_structure_scope): Identify stub types
> using the DW_AT_declaration attribute.
>
> tested on x86-linux. No regression. Fixes the testcase that was
> proposed by Andrew (even though it is not legal C) and the Ada
> case.
>
> OK to apply?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Joel
>
> PS: BTW, my past 3 months of traveling will soon be over. The past
> couple of weeks have been very hectic. I have noticed that there were
> some messages directed at me to which I haven't answered yet. I am
> really sorry. I have kept these messages and will try to answer them
> soon.
> Index: dwarf2read.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/dwarf2read.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.130
> diff -u -p -r1.130 dwarf2read.c
> --- dwarf2read.c 28 Jan 2004 18:43:06 -0000 1.130
> +++ dwarf2read.c 19 Feb 2004 13:58:42 -0000
> @@ -3077,6 +3077,9 @@ read_structure_scope (struct die_info *d
> TYPE_LENGTH (type) = 0;
> }
>
> + if (dwarf2_attr (die, DW_AT_declaration, cu) != NULL)
> + TYPE_FLAGS (type) |= TYPE_FLAG_STUB;
> +
> /* We need to add the type field to the die immediately so we don't
> infinitely recurse when dealing with pointers to the structure
> type within the structure itself. */
> @@ -3213,11 +3216,6 @@ read_structure_scope (struct die_info *d
> new_symbol (die, type, cu);
>
> do_cleanups (back_to);
> - }
> - else
> - {
> - /* No children, must be stub. */
> - TYPE_FLAGS (type) |= TYPE_FLAG_STUB;
> }
>
> processing_current_prefix = previous_prefix;