This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 04:13:18PM -0500, Jeff Johnston wrote:
See the attached test. There was some stuff in pthreads.exp about Crtl-C and alpha-*-osf*. Do I need to account for this platform?
Well, it's still supported, but I have no idea whether the bit in that test is necessary - or what it's supposed to accomplish. So let's ignore it.
+# This only works with native configurations +if ![isnative] then { + return +}
This shouldn't be necessary.
+set testfile "manythreads" +set srcfile ${testfile}.c +set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile} +if {[gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug libs=-lpthread}] != ""} {
See gdb_compile_pthreads.
+send_gdb "set print sevenbit-strings\n" ; gdb_expect -re "$gdb_prompt $"
gdb_test "set print sevenbit-strings" ""
+send_gdb "continue\n" +gdb_expect {
Everywhere you're using gdb_expect, please use gdb_test_multiple instead. For the "after" tests, you can use gdb_test_multiple with "" as the first argument.
+# Send a Ctrl-C and verify that we can do info threads and continue +after 100 {send_gdb "\003"}
Is 100 ms enough to be interesting?
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |