This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
traditional sigtramp system?
- From: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 17:37:32 -0500
- Subject: traditional sigtramp system?
Hello,
Can anyone point me at a "more traditional" signal trampoline system?
Where traditional means that, when delivering a signal, the program is
resumed at the first instruction of the signal trampoline, and not the
first instruction of the signal handler (as is now often the case).
The frame unwinders appear to have made huge chunks of infrun's signal
trampoline logic redundant and I'd prefer to have a system that I can
test it on.
Andrew