This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] update "info scope" with new symtypes


Andrew Cagney wrote:
Andrew Cagney wrote:

Add LOC_COMPUTED etc. to scope_info.




Michael, most of this patch is white space changes and as such should separated out and committed separatly.



Andrew, I could understand your objection if this were a request for review, but since it's a patch that I'm checking in directly,


Sorry, I don't understand. We're expected to apply standards uniformly (here minimizing white space) be it peer review or self-review.

We're even -- I don't understand either. Minimizing white space?


Anyway, this discussion occurred in 2000 -- I've reviewed it,
and it was entirely concerned with the difficulty of *reviewing*
patches that included mixed code and whitespace changes.

Since then, mixed changes that don't have to be reviewed have
frequently been posted without attracting comment.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]