This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: -file-list-exec-source-files
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Bob Rossi <bob at brasko dot net>
- Cc: ezannoni at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, gdbheads at gnu dot org, gdb-discuss at gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 06:40:35 -0400
- Subject: Re: -file-list-exec-source-files
- References: <20040306155700.GA9439@white> <20040311132508.GA2504@white> <20040329205545.GA26696@white> <20040405214043.GA2052@white> <20040412150620.GA9464@white> <20040420141001.GB4465@white> <uisft98sz.fsf@elta.co.il> <16519.59247.93650.941260@localhost.redhat.com> <20040426130529.GA11975@white> <20040506221258.GA7008@white> <20040522015250.GA26435@white>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 21:52:50 -0400
> From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
>
> OK, I just finished ripping down the ceiling and walls in my kitchen.
> Is there any chance my patch got reviewed in that time? There's an
> outstanding bet between my wife and I that I will be able to completely
> renovate my kitchen before this patch gets reviewed.
>
> What does that say about the GDB patch review process?!?
>
> Can I *even* get a response from someone capable of committing this
> patch?
>
> Someone with authority, pleeeaaassseeeee help me.
I've reviewed your patch 2 weeks ago and approved the patch to
gdb.texinfo. I also okayed the other parts of your patch, but the
final approval should come from developers who are responsible for the
MI stuff: Andrew Cagney and Elena Zannoni (according to the
MAINTAINERS file).