This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Commit] New file


 > The situation I fear is that the latest gdb-mi.el will not work with a
 > recent Emacs release.  We already had that with gdba.el, remember?

Sure, it will be difficult to keep everything in sync but I think that if you
note the similarities between gdb-mi.el to gdba.el it is also important to
note the differences.  Unlike you, I don't have the benefit of first hand
experience but this is what I have inferred. gdba.el was written by Tom Lord
and Jim Kingdon (both then at Cygnus) and was based on a very early version of
gud.el which, in turn, was written by Eric Raymond and modified by others. As
far as I can see, there was no communication between the original two parties,
and those Emacs developers either did not know about level 2 annotations or
chose not to use them. So could gdba.el could be called a fork. That is not
the intention with gdb-mi.el, indeed the reverse is true, it is trying to pull
things together.

Nick


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]