This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA]: threaded watchpoint test


   Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:25:18 -0400
   From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>

   Sounds good to me.  We'll probably want to clean up the other bit about
   using the board_info too; or... just recognize that we got a software
   watchpoint instead of a hardware one?

   Maybe not.  It could be a bug to get a software watchpoint when we
   expect a hardware one.  The question is whether we want to keep a
   separate list of "do we expect hardware watchpoints" in the testsuite.

Hmm, I'm getting a bit frustrated that folks keep adding things to the
testsuite that assume features that are not available on most things
not i386 GNU/Linux.

Why do we allow tests like this to be checked in if we know they
produce massive fails on many systems?

Mark


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]