This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: assert that target_fetch_registers did its job

From: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 14:54:24 -0400
Subject: Re: RFA: assert that target_fetch_registers did its job
References: <vt2oem6tjnk.fsf@zenia.home> <20040724004433.GA15591@nevyn.them.org> <410F86B4.3040500@gnu.org> <20040807184215.GA21818@nevyn.them.org>

Is there even a thread/lwp separation in GDB core?  My understanding
was that the core should never see anything having to do with an LWP;
at least the trivial LWP == thread mapping should have taken place
somewhere, and GDB should just talk to the threads.

In theory, yes. In reality, look at regcache.c :-(

Andrew

References:
- Re: RFA: assert that target_fetch_registers did its job
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: RFA: assert that target_fetch_registers did its job
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]