This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hello, Here is the test file for the patch described in http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-04/msg00463.html . The patch fixes the case s2-da -- the source was compiled using absolute name and is not available at that location any more; gdb should be able to find it in the same directory relative to a directory mentioned in the argument for the "directory" command (see the link above for a typescript). This used to work in 5.3 but was broken when fixing the case b4- -- the binary is specified as dot-slash-basename but does not exist in the current directory; gdb should not look for it in PATH (see http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2004-01/msg00244.html for an example). I am not sure what we want to do in cases s1-da, s3-da, s4-da and s5-da (the source was compiled using a non-absolute name; should gdb look for them under <source path>/$cdir, where <source path> is one of the arguments to the "directory" command?), so I describe the present behaviour as FAIL for now. The file was tested on gdb 6.2 under Debian unstable. I would welcome any comments about the test and suggestions about the mentioned cases. With kind regards, Baurjan.
Attachment:
openp.exp
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |