This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[RFC] Fix bug in MI -data-list-register-values, PSEUDO_REGS ignored


Hi!

That´s the first time a send a patch here, sorry if I´m doing anything wrong.

Problem: -data-list-register-values gives an error about invalid register number for some registers reported by -data-list-register-names.

Solution: The real problem is that mi_cmd_data_list_register_names computes "numregs = NUM_REGS + NUM_PSEUDO_REGS" but mi_cmd_data_list_register_values computes "numregs = NUM_REGS". So the solution is to also compute the pseudo registers.

The patch is trivial and is attached.
I thing the Changelog entry should be something like:

2004-08-25 Salvador E. Tropea <set@users.sf.net>

   * mi/mi-main.c (mi_cmd_data_list_register_values): Fixed wrong
   register number computation.

--
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Visit my home page: http://welcome.to/SetSoft or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Alternative e-mail: set@computer.org set@ieee.org Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA Phone: +(5411) 4759 0013


Index: gdb/mi/mi-main.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/mi/mi-main.c,v
retrieving revision 1.64
diff -u -r1.64 mi-main.c
--- gdb/mi/mi-main.c    3 Aug 2004 00:57:27 -0000       1.64
+++ gdb/mi/mi-main.c    25 Aug 2004 14:12:50 -0000
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@
      case, some entries of REGISTER_NAME will change depending upon
      the particular processor being debugged.  */
 
-  numregs = NUM_REGS;
+  numregs = NUM_REGS + NUM_PSEUDO_REGS;
 
   if (argc == 0)
     {




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]