This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Suggested ways to remove the need for xm-go32.h

From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Michael Chastain <mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com>
Cc: kettenis at gnu dot org, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 06:48:55 +0200
Subject: Re: [RFC] Suggested ways to remove the need for xm-go32.h
References: <01c49d82$Blat.v2.2.2$23875ec0@zahav.net.il><200409191144.i8JBiSA7045711@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl><01c49ec2$Blat.v2.2.2$834381e0@zahav.net.il> <4151DEC4.nailKQ02QGXYU@mindspring.com>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:21:24 -0400
> From: Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> "rb" and "wb" are mentioned in "man fopen" on these systems:
> 
>   alphaev56-dec-osf4.0g
>   alphaev68-dec-osf5.1b
>   hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00
>   hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11

Did you find any systems where "rb" and "wb" are _not_ mentioned?

> I'm cool with the wrapper-function idea.

Thanks for the feedback.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Suggested ways to remove the need for xm-go32.h
  - From: Michael Chastain

References:
- [RFC] Suggested ways to remove the need for xm-go32.h
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: [RFC] Suggested ways to remove the need for xm-go32.h
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: [RFC] Suggested ways to remove the need for xm-go32.h
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: [RFC] Suggested ways to remove the need for xm-go32.h
  - From: Michael Chastain

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]