This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA/testsuite/ada] Refine expected output of start command
- From: mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com (Michael Chastain)
- To: brobecker at gnat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:08:38 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: [RFA/testsuite/ada] Refine expected output of start command
>From gdb-patches-return-36411-mec.gnu=mindspring.com@sources.redhat.com Wed Oct 20 23:43:05 2004
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:49:15 -0700
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [RFA/testsuite/ada] Refine expected output of start command
Approved.
I don't know Ada so I'm at the mercy of people who do.
Your explanation is persuasive though.
It's okay if improving a test changes the result from a bad PASS
to a good FAIL.
===
2004-10-20 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
* gdb.ada/null_record.exp: Check where we stopped after
sending the start command, instead of where the associated
temporary breakpoint was inserted.