Re: [RFA]: Watchpoints per thread patch

[Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>]

Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com> writes:

> Jim Blandy wrote:
> >>> If you have a fix planned soon regarding the ptid format, I have
> >>> absolutely no objection to waiting for it.  However, if you can't
> >>> get around to this for a while due to other commitments or it is
> >>> going to take some hashing out on the list, let's stop punishing
> >>> the end-user and do something helpful while we work things out
> >>> proper.
> >>
> >>Jeff, I've already posted the thread-db change to make this
> >>unnecessary.  I was asked to rename the file first, and I've posted
> >>that too.
> > For those of us trying desperately to keep score, may I ask for a
> > recap of Our Story Thus Far?
> > - What are the specific pieces of work needed to do this The Right
> > Way?
> > - Which have been done already, or at least posted?
> > - How long will the rest take?
> > - Who has volunteered to do them?
> > I'd like to hear Daniel's, Andrew's, and Jeff's answers.
> >
> 
> Jim,
> 
>    I think this is settled now.  I am waiting for Daniel's patch to
> ptids to be posted and accepted.  Then, I will modify my previous
> patch over top of this.

Okay, that's how it looked to me, too.  Thanks.