Re: Assume solib.h

[Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>]

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:13:54 -0500
> > From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> > Cc: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, joseph@codesourcery.com, kevinb@redhat.com,
> >        gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> >
> >
> >
> > > > and how my change breaks it?
> > >
> > >
> > > This part I don't know the details about.  Mark said that it does
> > > break, and I spoke on the assumption that you agree with the fact of
> > > breakage,
> >
> > Unfortunatly your assumption is wrong.
>
>
> I wrote that before this was established.

Er,

My opening remark stated:

> It means breaking non solib.[hc] shared library systems.  Kevin indicated that there were two - AIX and HP/UX remaining.  I think we can live with that - we've patiently waited for what, more than two years for nothing to happen, so it is now time to give things that gentle push.

and then in my immediate reply to mark I stated:

> I gave it a full test with PowerPC GNU/Linux and sniff test with powerpc-elf.  If there are other problems, I'm sure they'll be sorted out. 

and that was followed by:

> Really!  Please look again at the proposal.

So how well established my assertion is depends on who you'd prefer to 
believe.

(your e-mail was several responses later)

Andrew