This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
[commit/testsuite] Drop xfail/kfail powerpc*-*-*
- From: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:01:23 -0500
- Subject: [commit/testsuite] Drop xfail/kfail powerpc*-*-*
The XFAIL's are bogus. The kfail's i've got working locally.
Andrew
2005-01-19 Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
* gdb.base/scope.exp (test_at_main): Delete any XFAIL and/or KFAIL
of powerpc*-*-*.
* gdb.hp/gdb.base-hp/callfwmall.exp (do_function_calls): Ditto.
* gdb.base/list.exp (test_list_function)
(test_list_filename_and_function): Ditto.
* gdb.base/callfuncs.exp (do_function_calls): Ditto.
Index: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/callfuncs.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -p -u -r1.15 callfuncs.exp
--- gdb.base/callfuncs.exp 23 Feb 2004 16:18:09 -0000 1.15
+++ gdb.base/callfuncs.exp 19 Jan 2005 16:56:55 -0000
@@ -189,17 +189,14 @@ proc do_function_calls {} {
# and attempting a jump through that (a totally random address).
setup_kfail "rs6000*-*-aix*" gdb/1457
setup_kfail "powerpc*-*-aix*" gdb/1457
- setup_kfail "powerpc64*-*-*" gdb/1457
setup_kfail hppa*-*-hpux* gdb/1457
gdb_test "p t_func_values(add,func_val2)" " = 1"
setup_kfail "rs6000*-*-aix*" gdb/1457
setup_kfail "powerpc*-*-aix*" gdb/1457
- setup_kfail "powerpc64*-*-*" gdb/1457
setup_kfail hppa*-*-hpux* gdb/1457
gdb_test "p t_func_values(func_val1,doubleit)" " = 1"
setup_kfail "rs6000*-*-aix*" gdb/1457
setup_kfail "powerpc*-*-aix*" gdb/1457
- setup_kfail "powerpc64*-*-*" gdb/1457
setup_kfail hppa*-*-hpux* gdb/1457
gdb_test "p t_call_add(add,3,4)" " = 7"
gdb_test "p t_call_add(func_val1,3,4)" " = 7"
Index: gdb.base/list.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/list.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -p -u -r1.10 list.exp
--- gdb.base/list.exp 30 Nov 2003 23:13:34 -0000 1.10
+++ gdb.base/list.exp 19 Jan 2005 16:56:55 -0000
@@ -235,7 +235,6 @@ proc test_list_function {} {
# Test "list function" for C include file
# Ultrix gdb is the second case, still correct.
# SunPRO cc is the third case.
- setup_xfail "powerpc-*-*"
gdb_test "list foo" "(3\[ \t\]+.*12\[ \t\]+bar \[(\]+.*\[)\]+;|2\[ \t\]+including file.*11\[ \t\]+bar \[(\]+.*\[)\]+;|1\[ \t\]+/. An include file.*10\[ \t\]+bar \[(\]+.*\[)\]+;)" "list function in include file"
}
@@ -422,7 +421,6 @@ proc test_list_filename_and_function {}
# Ultrix gdb is the second case, one line different but still correct.
# SunPRO cc is the third case.
setup_xfail "rs6000-*-*" 1804
- setup_xfail "powerpc-*-*" 1804
setup_xfail_format "COFF"
send_gdb "list list0.h:foo\n"
gdb_expect {
Index: gdb.base/scope.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/scope.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -p -u -r1.8 scope.exp
--- gdb.base/scope.exp 11 Jan 2004 23:16:25 -0000 1.8
+++ gdb.base/scope.exp 19 Jan 2005 16:56:55 -0000
@@ -94,8 +94,7 @@ proc test_at_main {} {
# Print scope0.c::filelocal_ro, which is 201
- # No clue why the powerpc fails this test.
- setup_xfail "powerpc-*-*"
+ # No clue why the rs6000 fails this test.
if { [test_compiler_info gcc-*-*] } then { setup_xfail "rs6000-*-*" }
if [gdb_test "print filelocal_ro" "\\\$$decimal = 201" "print filelocal_ro in test_at_main" ] {
gdb_suppress_tests ;
@@ -103,7 +102,6 @@ proc test_at_main {} {
if { [test_compiler_info gcc-*-*] } then { setup_xfail "rs6000-*-*" }
- setup_xfail "powerpc-*-*"
if [gdb_test "print 'scope0.c'::filelocal_ro" "\\\$$decimal = 201" "print 'scope0.c'::filelocal_ro" "No symbol \"scope0.c\" in current context.*" "print '$srcdir/$subdir/scope0.c'::filelocal_ro"] {
gdb_suppress_tests ;
}
@@ -204,7 +202,6 @@ proc test_at_foo {} {
# Print scope0.c::filelocal_ro, which is 201
if { [test_compiler_info gcc-*-*] } then { setup_xfail "rs6000-*-*" }
- setup_xfail "powerpc-*-*"
if [gdb_test "print 'scope0.c'::filelocal_ro" "\\\$$decimal = 201" "print 'scope0.c'::filelocal_ro" "No symbol \"scope0.c\" in current context.*" "print '$srcdir/$subdir/scope0.c'::filelocal_ro"] {
gdb_suppress_tests ;
}
@@ -309,7 +306,6 @@ proc test_at_bar {} {
# Print scope0.c::filelocal_ro, which is 201
if { [test_compiler_info gcc-*-*] } then { setup_xfail "rs6000-*-*" }
- setup_xfail "powerpc-*-*"
if [gdb_test "print 'scope0.c'::filelocal_ro" "\\\$$decimal = 201" "print 'scope0.c'::filelocal_ro at bar" "No symbol \"scope0.c\" in current context.*" "print '$srcdir/$subdir/scope0.c'::filelocal_ro"] {
gdb_suppress_tests ;
}
@@ -540,7 +536,6 @@ if [istarget "*-*-vxworks*"] {
# AIX--sections get mapped to the same address so we can't get the right one.
setup_xfail "rs6000-*-*"
-setup_xfail "powerpc-*-*"
gdb_test "print 'scope0.c'::filelocal_ro" "= 201"
Index: gdb.hp/gdb.base-hp/callfwmall.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.hp/gdb.base-hp/callfwmall.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -p -u -r1.1 callfwmall.exp
--- gdb.hp/gdb.base-hp/callfwmall.exp 7 Feb 2002 22:02:31 -0000 1.1
+++ gdb.hp/gdb.base-hp/callfwmall.exp 19 Jan 2005 16:56:55 -0000
@@ -256,14 +256,12 @@ proc do_function_calls {} {
# to avoid such problems in the common case. This may or may not help
# the RS6000.
setup_xfail "rs6000*-*-*"
- setup_xfail "powerpc*-*-*"
if {![istarget hppa*-*-hpux*]} then {
gdb_test "p t_func_values(add,func_val2)" " = 1"
}
setup_xfail "rs6000*-*-*"
- setup_xfail "powerpc*-*-*"
if {![istarget hppa*-*-hpux*]} then {
gdb_test "p t_func_values(func_val1,doubleit)" " = 1"
@@ -272,7 +270,6 @@ proc do_function_calls {} {
gdb_test "p t_call_add(func_val1,3,4)" " = 7"
setup_xfail "rs6000*-*-*"
- setup_xfail "powerpc*-*-*"
if {![istarget hppa*-*-hpux*]} then {
gdb_test "p t_call_add(add,3,4)" " = 7"