This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Use HAVE_LONGLONG instead of __GNUC__ to check for longlong support.


I resubmitted the patch with AC_CHECK_TYPES. The manual says that
"Autoconf, up to 2.13, used to provide to another version of
AC_CHECK_TYPE, broken by design."
(http://www.delorie.com/gnu/docs/autoconf/autoconf_60.html) Is
this what you are refering to? Please
review my updated patch and ok for commmit.


-----
manjo
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ Cogito ergo sum                                                          +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:58:15AM +0000, M.M. Kettenis wrote:
> > Manoj Iyer <manjo@austin.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Daniel,
> > >
> > >Used autoheader to generate the config.in file, but it does not look
> > >pretty, also, removed the comments that you did not like.
> > >
> > >2005-04-18  Manoj Iyer  <manjo@austin.ibm.com>
> > >        * configure.ac: Added check for long long.
> > >        * config.in: Regenerated.
> > >        * configure: Regenerated.
> > >        * words.h: Modified logic to check for HAVE_LONGLONG instead of
> > >        __GNUC__, added config.h header file.
> >
> > Please use AC_CHECK_TYPES, it should take care of defining
> > HAVE_LONG_LONG (note the extra underscore) and the comment all by
> > itself.
>
> Wasn't there some problem with AC_CHECK_TYPES?  I remember there used
> to be a comment in gdb/configure.in saying to use it, but it was
> removed and the manual check is still there.
>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> CodeSourcery, LLC
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]