This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] (Resubmit) Use HAVE_LONGLONG instead of GNUC to check for long long support.

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Manoj Iyer <manjo at austin dot ibm dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:36:34 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC] (Resubmit) Use HAVE_LONGLONG instead of __GNUC__ to check for long long support.
References: <7320552869539569@webhare> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504190525100.10989@lazy> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504190552350.10989@lazy> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504191705460.22477@lazy>

On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 05:06:28PM -0500, Manoj Iyer wrote:
> 
> 
> Anymore thoughts on this patch? ok to commit?

Please wait a bit.  I asked Mark a question, and I haven't had time to
go digging for the answer myself yet.  It's only been a couple of
hours.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] (Resubmit) Use HAVE_LONGLONG instead of __GNUC__ to check for long long support.
  - From: Mark Kettenis

References:
- Re: [RFC] Use HAVE_LONGLONG instead of __GNUC__ to check for long long support.
  - From: M.M. Kettenis
- Re: [RFC] Use HAVE_LONGLONG instead of __GNUC__ to check for longlong support.
  - From: Manoj Iyer
- [RFC] (Resubmit) Use HAVE_LONGLONG instead of __GNUC__ to check forlong long support.
  - From: Manoj Iyer
- Re: [RFC] (Resubmit) Use HAVE_LONGLONG instead of __GNUC__ to checkfor long long support.
  - From: Manoj Iyer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [RFC] (Resubmit) Use HAVE_LONGLONG instead of __GNUC__ to check for long long support.

Re: [RFC] (Resubmit) Use HAVE_LONGLONG instead of GNUC to check for long long support.