This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
[RFC] Is this kind of patch welcomed?
- From: Wu Zhou <woodzltc at cn dot ibm dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 05:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: [RFC] Is this kind of patch welcomed?
This is to fix a typo in remote.c, found while I am reading the
source code. Is this kind of patch welcomed? If it is, should
I add a changelog entry as well? If not, please ignore it.
Thanks.
Index: gdb/remote.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/remote.c,v
retrieving revision 1.190
diff -c -p -r1.190 remote.c
*** gdb/remote.c 16 May 2005 16:36:24 -0000 1.190
--- gdb/remote.c 24 May 2005 04:08:31 -0000
*************** struct gdb_ext_thread_info
*** 1114,1120 ****
int active; /* Has state interesting to GDB?
regs, stack. */
char display[256]; /* Brief state display, name,
! blocked/syspended. */
char shortname[32]; /* To be used to name threads. */
char more_display[256]; /* Long info, statistics, queue depth,
whatever. */
--- 1114,1120 ----
int active; /* Has state interesting to GDB?
regs, stack. */
char display[256]; /* Brief state display, name,
! blocked/suspended. */
char shortname[32]; /* To be used to name threads. */
char more_display[256]; /* Long info, statistics, queue depth,
whatever. */