This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Add support for Morpho ms1 processor

From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
Cc: kevinb at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:40:26 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add support for Morpho ms1 processor
References: <20050603172038.449a41b9@ironwood.lan> <200506102312.j5ANCoWe018703@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>

Mark Kettenis wrote:

Especially naming an enum `gdb_regnum' seems like a bad idea to me. What's the E_-prefix trying to convey? I seem to remember a few other embedded processors using the same E_-prefix for their register names.


Yeah, those were probably all mine.  I started doing that
a few years ago.  The prefix was just to differentiate the
enum from the macro -- avoid namespace pollution, you might
say.

References:
- [RFC] Add support for Morpho ms1 processor
  - From: Kevin Buettner
- Re: [RFC] Add support for Morpho ms1 processor
  - From: Mark Kettenis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]