This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] -stack-info-frames
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:01:30 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] -stack-info-frames
- References: <17075.21529.964955.923197@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:52:09AM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote:
>
> Here's a patch for -stack-info-frames. Having just read Jason's e-mail
> about how quick "-stack-list-frames 0 0" is, I'm not sure its necessary.
> I thought I'd send it anyway.
>
> Even if we decide not to implement -stack-info-frames, could you please
> approve the other parts: Not testing for stack, and not allowing an argument
> (mi_cmd_stack_select_frame).
How do you feel about putting an optional argument on _this_ one?
-stack-select-frame 0; -stack-info-frame is much like
-stack-list-frames 0 0; but "-stack-info-frame 2" doesn't have an
obvious analogue.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC