This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Start Fortran support for variable objects.


On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 09:02:34PM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
>  > On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 09:29:16AM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote:
>  > > 
>  > > This patch adjusts the offset from 0 to 1 to allow the display of arrays
>  > > in Fortran using variable objects.
>  > 
>  > I see that you're hardcoding this based on language.  Can we do it
>  > based on type instead?  Specifically, TYPE_LOW_BOUND and
>  > TYPE_HIGH_BOUND.  We have got type information here - unless I'm
>  > misreading, var->type should be the type of the array.
> 
> They look pretty similar to me.
> 
> C:
> 
> (top-gdb) p TYPE_LOW_BOUND(var->type)
> $18 = 0
> (top-gdb) p* var->type->main_type
> $33 = {code = TYPE_CODE_ARRAY, upper_bound_type = BOUND_SIMPLE, 
>   lower_bound_type = BOUND_SIMPLE, name = 0x0, tag_name = 0x0, 
>   objfile = 0x8357618, target_type = 0x8372c74, flags = 0, nfields = 1, 
>   vptr_fieldno = -1, fields = 0x837496c, vptr_basetype = 0x0, type_specific = {
>     cplus_stuff = 0x0, floatformat = 0x0}}
> 
> Fortran:
> 
> (top-gdb) p TYPE_LOW_BOUND(var->type)
> $3 = 0
> (top-gdb) p* var->type->main_type
> $8 = {code = TYPE_CODE_ARRAY, upper_bound_type = BOUND_SIMPLE, 
>   lower_bound_type = BOUND_SIMPLE, name = 0x0, tag_name = 0x0, 
>   objfile = 0x8357618, target_type = 0x83654cc, flags = 0, nfields = 1, 
>   vptr_fieldno = -1, fields = 0x83655c4, vptr_basetype = 0x0, 
>   type_specific = {cplus_stuff = 0x0, floatformat = 0x0}}
> 
> I need more of a clue to follow your suggestion.

Well, that's what was SUPPOSED to happen, anyway.

 <1><a52>: Abbrev Number: 4 (DW_TAG_array_type)
     DW_AT_sibling     : <a62>  
     DW_AT_type        : <a62>  
 <2><a5b>: Abbrev Number: 5 (DW_TAG_subrange_type)
     DW_AT_type        : <a62>  
     DW_AT_upper_bound : 4      

I would have expected there to be a lower bound also... but there just
isn't.  Your patch is more or less OK.  Let me reply to it to pick up
some formatting comments.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]