This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: $argc variable
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Andrew STUBBS <andrew dot stubbs at st dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 19:45:53 +0200
- Subject: Re: $argc variable
- References: <436F35E9.4070808@st.com> <20051107133538.GA2331@nevyn.them.org> <43709E94.4070004@st.com> <u7jbisp6n.fsf@gnu.org> <4371D9A6.40109@st.com> <u3bm5sk6i.fsf@gnu.org> <43731C16.2040203@st.com> <20051113173524.GC1945@nevyn.them.org> <4378BB1A.9070606@st.com> <u7jbaim9z.fsf@gnu.org> <20051115044045.GA12833@nevyn.them.org>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:40:45 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>
> The code is fine too.
>
> Should this go on the branch? Should it go in NEWS? My inclination is
> "both".
Same here.