This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Fix gdb.asm/asm-source.exp for hppa64-hpux

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb at red-bean dot com>
Cc: Randolph Chung <randolph at tausq dot org>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 09:27:04 -0500
Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix gdb.asm/asm-source.exp for hppa64-hpux
References: <438E3C26.4010805@tausq.org> <8f2776cb0511302141q6629a801laf783dcddb7a973d@mail.gmail.com> <438E8E5F.6070209@tausq.org> <8f2776cb0511302155p28faa4e0j31512c1799bb5c93@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 09:55:12PM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote:
> On 11/30/05, Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org> wrote:
> > > Is there a plausible place to put a comment explaining this constraint?
> >
> > I can add comments to common.inc, pa.inc/pa64.inc or asm-source.exp. Any
> > preferences?
> 
> pa.inc/pa64.inc aren't good --- people working on other platforms will
> ignore those, but it's people on other platforms that we need to
> reach.  common.inc seems like the right thing.  If there were a
> skeleton .inc file, that'd be ideal.

I agree that common.inc is best.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] Fix gdb.asm/asm-source.exp for hppa64-hpux
  - From: Randolph Chung

References:
- Re: [RFA] Fix gdb.asm/asm-source.exp for hppa64-hpux
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: [RFA] Fix gdb.asm/asm-source.exp for hppa64-hpux
  - From: Randolph Chung
- Re: [RFA] Fix gdb.asm/asm-source.exp for hppa64-hpux
  - From: Jim Blandy

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]