This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix ptype problem printing typedefs defined differently in different compilation units
On 1/23/06, Fred Fish <fnf@specifix.com> wrote:
> This is why I think the correct and complete solution is to allow the
> user to directly specify the context.
Sure. That would entail extending the 'type_exp' non-terminal to have
a FILENAME COLONCOLON TYPE production. Sounds like the right thing.
What's confusing me, though, is that you seemed to present that
possibility as an alternative to the patch previously posted. It
looks to me like both changes make sense, and they seem independent of
each other. Since we have the test case in there failing right now,
I'd like to get the previous patch in, and perhaps continue the
discussion about filename qualification in a separate thread.