Re: [PATCH] Add fullname field for MI -break-info command

[Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>]

I've probably not followed the whole thread, but here goes...

> > Hmm, so I should update all examples of "-break-list" output as well? What 
> > path should I put there? Is /home/foo/bar/<whatever-the-source-file-is>.c 
> > fine?

> Yes, please update the documentation for -break-list,

-break-insert also uses print_one_breakpoint so I guess that should be
updated

>                                                       and I don't know
> if you should even bother with -break-info. I still don't know if that
> command should exist if it's identical to -break-list. A machine
> interface does not need 2 commands for the same functionatlity, IMO.

I don't know if its needed either but now its there I don't see any
point in removing it (if it ain't broke don't fix it).

Also the doc says:

    The `-break-info' Command

    Synopsis

          -break-info BREAKPOINT
    
       Get information about a single breakpoint.

    GDB command

    The corresponding GDB command is `info break BREAKPOINT'.

    Example

    N.A.

and

    Also note that the commands with a non-available example (N.A.) are not
    yet implemented.

but -break-info clearly has been implemented.


Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob