This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] fix spurious SIGSEGV faults under Cygwin

From: 'Daniel Jacobowitz' <drow at false dot org>
To: Dave Korn <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
Cc: cygwin-patches at cygwin dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 12:56:42 -0500
Subject: Re: [patch] fix spurious SIGSEGV faults under Cygwin
References: <20060202174600.GA5696@nevyn.them.org> <009701c62821$5ae9a050$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>

On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 05:51:54PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 02 February 2006 17:46, 'Daniel Jacobowitz' wrote:
> 
> > "this information" does not refer to "if there is a debugger attached".
> 
> 
>   Ah!  Thank you for solving my parsing problem!
> 
>   I still can't tell if that's because "this information" does not refer to the return value of IsDebuggerPresent, or because it
> does but that return value does not detect gdb, but the feeling of utter bewilderment is subsiding somewhat!

I assume it refers to whether Cygwin is handling a validity check at
the moment.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- Re: [patch] fix spurious SIGSEGV faults under Cygwin
  - From: 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
- RE: [patch] fix spurious SIGSEGV faults under Cygwin
  - From: Dave Korn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]