This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC]: Document patch for F90 derived type support

> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:38:29 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> > Perhaps I'm confused: isn't "int4" a 32-bit integer?  I thought it
> > was, but if I was mistaken, my apologies for the noise.
> 
> It's not reserved at all in the input to the compiler - it might be
> something different than a type, or it might be the name of a record
> type (whatever the correct name for that is).

I'm still not sure I understand, but I think you do agree that this is
a 32-bit integer.  In that case, I maintain that we should display
"integer(4)", not "int4".
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]