Re: [PATCH]: Fix gdb.mi/mi-regs.exp

[Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>]

 > > > But these tests are for the MI interface.  Register tests for specific
 > > > architectures could presumably go in gdb.base/regs.exp and tests in
 > > > mi-regs.exp could be more general e.g just check
 > > > -data-list-register-names returns a list of values, count them and use
 > > > this information for tests on -data-list-register-values.
 > > 
 > > In the long term that's probably a good idea.
 > 
 > mi-regs.exp should check "the registers are internally consistent
 > and sane".  It could encode knowledge of which registers must be
 > present, or not; it works either way...

I'm not sure if you're agreeing or not.  I think I made the change to
mi_cmd_data_list_register_values which broke the test for sparc.  As I ran
the testsuite on i386, I saw no failures of course.  Clearly tests which
check the registers are internally consistent and sane for all architectures
are desirable.  Since no-one is offering to do that shall I try to write a few
generic ones as suggested above?

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob