This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Initialize default floating-point model on ARM for GNU binaries


> From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:31:56 +0100
> 
> The problem is that in the most common configuration still using the
> legacy ELF format (arm-unknown-elf) the flags are generated incorrectly
> by the compiler/assembler combination.  These tools fail to correctly
> set the softfpa bit in the ELF header and the result is that gdb will
> think they contain FPA instructions when they do not.  Thus I think this
> change will cause a large number of new failures on arm-elf.
> 
> I guess we could fudge this by making the auto-detect code fold case 0
> on to case EF_ARM_SOFT_FLOAT, but it would need a big comment to explain
> the background.

That doesn't sound like a bad idea.  Here's a patch with a variant of
this: leave things set to "auto" if no flag is set.  That way the code
path for arm-unknown-elf will be very close to what it is right now,
which will default to "softfpa" in the end.

ok?


Index: ChangeLog
from  Mark Kettenis  <kettenis@gnu.org>

	* arm-tdep.c (arm_gdbarch_init): Get default floating-point model
	from ELF flags for binaries produced by the GNU toolchain.

Index: arm-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/arm-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.211
diff -u -p -r1.211 arm-tdep.c
--- arm-tdep.c 16 Jul 2006 10:33:25 -0000 1.211
+++ arm-tdep.c 18 Jul 2006 17:43:47 -0000
@@ -2594,7 +2594,7 @@ arm_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info in
 
   if (arm_abi == ARM_ABI_AUTO && info.abfd != NULL)
     {
-      int ei_osabi;
+      int ei_osabi, e_flags;
 
       switch (bfd_get_flavour (info.abfd))
 	{
@@ -2611,19 +2611,18 @@ arm_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info in
 
 	case bfd_target_elf_flavour:
 	  ei_osabi = elf_elfheader (info.abfd)->e_ident[EI_OSABI];
+	  e_flags = elf_elfheader (info.abfd)->e_flags;
+
 	  if (ei_osabi == ELFOSABI_ARM)
 	    {
 	      /* GNU tools used to use this value, but do not for EABI
-		 objects.  There's nowhere to tag an EABI version anyway,
-		 so assume APCS.  */
+		 objects.  There's nowhere to tag an EABI version
+		 anyway, so assume APCS.  */
 	      arm_abi = ARM_ABI_APCS;
 	    }
 	  else if (ei_osabi == ELFOSABI_NONE)
 	    {
-	      int e_flags, eabi_ver;
-
-	      e_flags = elf_elfheader (info.abfd)->e_flags;
-	      eabi_ver = EF_ARM_EABI_VERSION (e_flags);
+	      int eabi_ver = EF_ARM_EABI_VERSION (e_flags);
 
 	      switch (eabi_ver)
 		{
@@ -2640,8 +2639,32 @@ arm_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info in
 		  break;
 
 		default:
+		  /* Leave it as "auto".  */
 		  warning (_("unknown ARM EABI version 0x%x"), eabi_ver);
-		  arm_abi = ARM_ABI_APCS;
+		  break;
+		}
+	    }
+
+	  if (fp_model == ARM_FLOAT_AUTO)
+	    {
+	      int e_flags = elf_elfheader (info.abfd)->e_flags;
+
+	      switch (e_flags & (EF_ARM_SOFT_FLOAT | EF_ARM_VFP_FLOAT))
+		{
+		case 0:
+		  /* Leave it as "auto".  Strictly speaking this case
+		     means FPA, but almost nobody uses that now, and
+		     many toolchains fail to set the appropriate bits
+		     for the floating-point model they use.  */
+		  break;
+		case EF_ARM_SOFT_FLOAT:
+		  fp_model = ARM_FLOAT_SOFT_FPA;
+		  break;
+		case EF_ARM_VFP_FLOAT:
+		  fp_model = ARM_FLOAT_VFP;
+		  break;
+		case EF_ARM_SOFT_FLOAT | EF_ARM_VFP_FLOAT:
+		  fp_model = ARM_FLOAT_SOFT_VFP;
 		  break;
 		}
 	    }


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]