This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Replace deprecated_target_new_objfile_hook by observer?

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Jim Ingham <jingham at apple dot com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:11:21 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC] Replace deprecated_target_new_objfile_hook by observer?
References: <20061017233217.GS1903@adacore.com> <20061017233524.GA18064@nevyn.them.org> <20061018002021.GA1338@adacore.com> <20061018013852.GA21939@nevyn.them.org> <535BF17A-E776-4DE4-979B-7E6FBA505E31@apple.com>

On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 10:06:43AM -0700, Jim Ingham wrote:
> Isn't the initialization order given by the order of .o files listed  
> in COMMON_OBS in Makefile.in?  So if you need to enforce a particular  
> order of initialization, you can adjust the ordering in this list.

Looks like you're right.  But, still, let's just not go there.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- [RFC] Replace deprecated_target_new_objfile_hook by observer?
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [RFC] Replace deprecated_target_new_objfile_hook by observer?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [RFC] Replace deprecated_target_new_objfile_hook by observer?
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [RFC] Replace deprecated_target_new_objfile_hook by observer?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]