This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA]: gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/altivec-regs.exp Broken testcase

From: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
To: deuling at de dot ibm dot com
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, drow at false dot org
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:48:25 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: [RFA]: gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/altivec-regs.exp Broken testcase
References: <45AC7532.6010108@de.ibm.com> <200701162128.l0GLS1U4024821@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070117055939.GA19331@nevyn.them.org> <45ADC40B.6000500@de.ibm.com>

> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:36:59 +0100
> From: Markus Deuling <deuling@de.ibm.com>
> 
> But I think inserting
> +set endianness ""
> is a good idea. Then the testcase would have FAILed instead of abort
> with an error.

I agree.  Feel free to commit that bit.

Mark

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA]: gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/altivec-regs.exp Broken testcase
  - From: Markus Deuling

References:
- [RFA]: gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/altivec-regs.exp Broken testcase
  - From: Markus Deuling
- Re: [RFA]: gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/altivec-regs.exp Broken testcase
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: [RFA]: gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/altivec-regs.exp Broken testcase
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [RFA]: gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/altivec-regs.exp Broken testcase
  - From: Markus Deuling

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]