This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch RFC] Re: Notes on a frame_unwind_address_in_block problem
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:32:43 -0500
- Subject: Re: [patch RFC] Re: Notes on a frame_unwind_address_in_block problem
- References: <200701031137.l03Bb0rT031898@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070103161257.GA14162@nevyn.them.org> <200701032027.l03KRv4h000275@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070103203007.GA23392@nevyn.them.org> <200701032158.l03LwPeq026191@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070103220223.GK17935@nevyn.them.org> <200701032223.l03MN8u0001386@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070103222853.GA26905@nevyn.them.org> <20070220123852.GA10630@caradoc.them.org> <200702222127.l1MLRpfW003517@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 10:27:51PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Sorry that I didn't have the time to review this earlier. This still
> contains the check to catch recursion in frame_unwind_find_by_frame(),
> but that code really shouldn't be necessary now, so I'd prefer it if
> you removed it since it is quite ugly.
Fine by me - I'll just discard the frame-unwind.c part when I commit
it then. It was only useful during testing but I don't imagine it
will catch much afterwards. Thanks.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery