This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [gdbserver] Use enum target_signal in _send_signal.

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves at portugalmail dot pt>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 12:22:46 -0500
Subject: Re: [gdbserver] Use enum target_signal in _send_signal.
References: <45E0C90C.7030101@portugalmail.pt> <20070225021135.GA20988@caradoc.them.org> <45E1006A.4020004@portugalmail.pt>

On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 03:20:10AM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
> I agree.  I looked at shoehorning this into target_ops->(*resume)() with
> TARGET_SIGNAL_INT, but that would be wrong, as resume expects an
> already stopped process, and send_signal was used to do the actual
> stopping.
> 
> How does this look?

Great.  Thank you - this is OK to commit.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- [gdbserver] Use enum target_signal in _send_signal.
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: [gdbserver] Use enum target_signal in _send_signal.
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [gdbserver] Use enum target_signal in _send_signal.
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]