This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl, denis dot pilat at st dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:01:01 +0300
Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking
References: <460BD630.20709@st.com> <19115.212.123.203.30.1175190093.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <20070329174808.GA28084@caradoc.them.org>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:48:08 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Denis PILAT <denis.pilat@st.com>, 	gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> 
> GDB definitely does not support systems without <signal.h>, but
> gdbserver now tries to.

Then perhaps we should add this information to gdb/README: it now
explicitly says that an ISO C compiler is required, without
qualifications.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking
  - From: Denis PILAT
- Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]