This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfc] Shared libraries over the remote protocol, take two
- From: Jim Blandy <jimb at codesourcery dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Cc: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>, Pedro Alves <pedro_alves at portugalmail dot pt>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:13:09 -0700
- Subject: Re: [rfc] Shared libraries over the remote protocol, take two
- References: <20070618150211.GA23415@caradoc.them.org>
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
> Index: gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
> ===================================================================
> --- gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo.orig 2007-06-18 10:15:05.000000000 -0400
> +++ gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo 2007-06-18 10:15:14.000000000 -0400
> @@ -12856,58 +12856,80 @@ If you do, that may be a bug in your rem
> in @value{GDBN}. You may want to report the problem to the
> @value{GDBN} developers.
>
> -The available settings are:
> +For each packet @var{name}, the command to enable or disable the
> +packet is @code{set remote @var{name}-packet}. The available settings
> +are:
Not a big deal by any means, but: while I understand the appeal of not
repeating '-packet' over and over again, I wonder if this is going to
lead to questions as people jump straight to the table and skip the
explanation. It seems to me there's some value in having the table
list exactly what you're supposed to type.