This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] build-id .debug files load (like .gnu_debuglink)
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, roland at redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 17:16:21 +0300
- Subject: Re: [patch] build-id .debug files load (like .gnu_debuglink)
- References: <20070824180450.GA4216@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20070824182028.GA19512@caradoc.them.org> <20070825224914.GA11255@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20070825235805.GA11876@caradoc.them.org> <20070826094053.GA31348@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <u642w11sy.fsf@gnu.org> <20070901081934.GA31205@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <ups12vfro.fsf@gnu.org> <20070901113530.GA30667@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <uir6uvayc.fsf@gnu.org> <20070901131212.GA32719@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 15:12:12 +0200
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, roland@redhat.com
>
> On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 14:15:07 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> ...
> > But the first command, the one to create the separate debug info file,
> > is still needed, right?
> >
> > In any case, we should tell that these commands (or at least the last
> > one) is only needed for the debug-link method.
>
> Enhanced the section I hope according to your advice.
Thanks, this is okay.
> +foo.debug} has the same functionality as the two separating commands and the
> +one linking command above.
I'd suggest to rewrite this as follows:
+foo.debug} has the same functionality as the two @code{objcopy} commands
+and the @code{ln -s} command above, together.