This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[rfc] [05/15] Add gdbarch to register_name callback in v850-tdep.c
- From: Markus Deuling <deuling at de dot ibm dot com>
- To: GDB Patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Cc: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:45:46 +0100
- Subject: [rfc] [05/15] Add gdbarch to register_name callback in v850-tdep.c
Hi,
this patch adds gdbarch to register_name callback in v850-tdep.c
Is this ok to commit?
ChangeLog:
* v850-tdep.c (v850_register_name, v850e_register_name): Add gdbarch
parameter.
(v850_unwind_sp, v850_unwind_pc): Replace current_gdbarch by gdbarch.
--
Markus Deuling
GNU Toolchain for Linux on Cell BE
deuling@de.ibm.com
diff -urpN src/gdb/v850-tdep.c dev/gdb/v850-tdep.c
--- src/gdb/v850-tdep.c 2007-08-23 20:08:46.000000000 +0200
+++ dev/gdb/v850-tdep.c 2007-10-30 11:52:41.000000000 +0100
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ struct pifsr /* Info about one saved re
};
static const char *
-v850_register_name (int regnum)
+v850_register_name (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int regnum)
{
static const char *v850_reg_names[] =
{ "r0", "r1", "r2", "r3", "r4", "r5", "r6", "r7",
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ v850_register_name (int regnum)
}
static const char *
-v850e_register_name (int regnum)
+v850e_register_name (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int regnum)
{
static const char *v850e_reg_names[] =
{
@@ -939,14 +939,14 @@ static CORE_ADDR
v850_unwind_sp (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct frame_info *next_frame)
{
return frame_unwind_register_unsigned (next_frame,
- gdbarch_sp_regnum (current_gdbarch));
+ gdbarch_sp_regnum (gdbarch));
}
static CORE_ADDR
v850_unwind_pc (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct frame_info *next_frame)
{
return frame_unwind_register_unsigned (next_frame,
- gdbarch_pc_regnum (current_gdbarch));
+ gdbarch_pc_regnum (gdbarch));
}
static struct frame_id