This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: New scope checking patch

From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at specifix dot com>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Rob Quill <rob dot quill at gmail dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:07:12 -0800
Subject: Re: New scope checking patch
References: <baf6008d0711120829l3c0201aakf477dd4d6cfd440e@mail.gmail.com> <m363y2lcl1.fsf@codesourcery.com> <baf6008d0801101652m13f884b5y1fdd02418a2b54c5@mail.gmail.com> <m37iigugbw.fsf@codesourcery.com>

On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 14:50 -0800, Jim Blandy wrote:

> Use 'cvs diff -u' or 'cvs diff -c' to produce unified or context
> diffs.  Unified diffs seem to be the more widely preferred form these
> days.  All patches posted to this list (or pretty much to any other
> open source list) should be in unified or context diff form.

In a previous thread, we sort of reached (or approached)
a loose consensus that "diff -up" is preferred.

You didn't mention -p, but folks didn't like -p without the -u
anyways...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New scope checking patch
  - From: Jim Blandy

References:
- Re: New scope checking patch
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: New scope checking patch
  - From: Rob Quill
- Re: New scope checking patch
  - From: Jim Blandy

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]