This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Fix Ericsson DICOS inferior function calls
- From: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
- To: pedro at codesourcery dot com
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 00:56:21 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: Fix Ericsson DICOS inferior function calls
- References: <200807072309.56077.pedro@codesourcery.com>
> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 23:09:55 +0100
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch fixes inferior function calls on DICOS, by putting
> the call dummy breakpoint location on the stack. The comments
> in the patch describe why.
>
> Daniel approved this offline, so I checked it in.
Hmm, the reason for providing frame_align() is pretty bogus;
instruction alignment has little or nothing to do with stack
alignment. It's just that most RISC ISAs require strict memory
alignment at something that happens to be a multiple of the
instruction size.
I'm also not sure the frame_align() you wrote does what you think it
does. IIRC, on i386, you'll actually need to align on an odd 8-byte
border to get the performance benefit you mention;
i386_push_dummy_call() should take care of that (but may currently not
do that in all cases).
I think we should get rid of generic_push_dummy_code(), and instead
require that each target that puts the dummy breakpoint on the stack
provides its own push_dummy_code() function. Could you provide one
for DICOS?
> 2008-07-07 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
>
> * i386-dicos-tdep.c: Include "inferior.h".
> (i386_dicos_frame_align): New.
> (i386_dicos_init_abi): Register i386_dicos_frame_align. Set call
> dummy location ON_STACK.
> * Makefile.in (i386-dicos-tdep.o): Depend on $(inferior_h).