Re: [rfc][00/37] Eliminate builtin_type_ macros

[Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>]

> > Sure! I don't know what this didn't cross my mind earlier, I guess
> > I was in a bit of a crunch... Will do that tomorrow (I'm also planning
> > on submitting a bunch of patches tomorrow as well, if things go as
> > planned - so that'll be a good time for that).
> 
> OK, thanks!

OK, I ended up checking in both patches (there was simply too much
confusion on the second one, so it was simpler if I just change
the use of builtin_type_int into builtin_type_int32).  Hopefully,
this should clear the way for you to commit your series of patches!

2008-09-10  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>

        * ada-lang.c (ada_evaluate_subexp) [BINOP_ADD, BINOP_SUB]:
        Add special handling for pointer types.

2008-09-10  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>

        * ada-lang.c (ada_evaluate_subexp) [OP_ATR_SIZE]: Use
        archecture-neutral builtin_type_int32 instead of builtin_type_int.

As I said, using int32 is not completely ideal, but should be good
enough in practice. If someone ever hits that limitation, I'll think
about writing a function that returns a type that's big enough to hold
a given LONGEST/ULONGEST...

Actual patches attached. Tested on x86-linux by running the gdb.ada
testcases.

Cheers,
-- 
Joel

Attachment: 01-ptrdiff.diff
Description: Text document

Attachment: 02-size_atr.diff
Description: Text document