This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [reverse RFA] no singlestep-over-BP in reverse
> And I believe that consistent behavior / semantics should be:
>
> If you tell me that you are stopped at instruction 1000,
> regardless of whether you were going forward or backward
> when you got there, then I will expect that if I tell you
> to execute forward, you will execute the instruction at
> 1000.
This makes total sense to me. I think I would be very confused
by the debugger if I started going back and forth with a debugger
that didn't follow the semantics above.
--
Joel